Scruggs, who died in 2001, was working at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution when she broke a story that the FBI was investigating Jewell, a security guard who came under suspicion for orchestrating the Centennial Olympic Park bombing in 1996 after he spotted and reported a pipe bomb was that had been left in a bag near a large crowd. He was later exonerated and Eric Rudolph was identified as the bomber. Rudolph pleaded guilty and is now serving a life sentence.The paper is claiming that Warner Bros. and the movie's producers took dramatic license and portrayed Scruggs, played by Olivia Wilde in the film, as having traded sex for information from a FBI source, and having done so due to being exploited by the newspaper — accusations the paper denies. Jon Hamm plays the FBI agent who tips her off. (CNN and Warner Bros. share parent company WarnerMedia.)The AJC has asked that Warner Bros. add a disclaimer to the movie, hiring a Hollywood lawyer, Martin Singer, to represent it, sending a letter to the studio."We hereby demand that you immediately issue a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film's portrayal of events and characters," the letter, sent to Warner Bros., the film's director Eastwood, and screenwriter Billy Ray, reads. The newspaper went on to call the portrayal of Scruggs "false," "malicious" and "extremely defamatory" in the letter, which states she was reduced to a "sex-trading object in the film.""Such a portrayal makes it appear that the AJC sexually exploited its staff and/or that it facilitated or condoned offering sexual gratification to sources in exchange for stories. That is entirely false and malicious, and it is extremely defamatory and damaging," the letter states.The Atlanta Journal-Constitution's editor in chief, Kevin Riley, called the portrayal of Scruggs "offensive." Riley said in a statement to IndieWire "there is no evidence that this ever happened," adding the depiction was "deeply troubling in the #MeToo era."Warner Bros. is defending the movie, calling the paper's claims "baseless.""The film is based on a wide range of highly credible source material. There is no disputing that Richard Jewell was an innocent man whose reputation and life were shredded by a miscarriage of justice. It is unfortunate and the ultimate irony that the Atlanta Journal Constitution, having been a part of the rush to judgment of Richard Jewell, is now trying to malign our filmmakers and cast," the studio said in a statement to CNN. "'Richard Jewell' focuses on the real victim, seeks to tell his story, confirm his innocence and restore his name."Warner Bros. pointed to a disclaimer included at the end of the movie."The film is based on actual historical events," the disclaimer reads. "Dialogue and certain events and characters contained in the film were created for the purposes of dramatization."Wilde, too, has defended her portrayal of Scruggs."I did a ton of research, I really embraced her dynamic, multidimensional nuanced perRead More – Source


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here