SHARE

The City of Los Angeles sued the Department of Justice because it did not receive any funding from the Community Oriented Policing Services grant program, which is aimed at initiatives to build trust between communities and law enforcement agencies. Los Angeles chose "building trust and respect" as its focus area and did not mention illegal immigration in its application because of its policy as a sanctuary city.The panel of judges ruled that "because DOJ's scoring factors encouraged, but did not coerce, an applicant to cooperate on immigration matters, the panel also rejected Los Angeles's claims that DOJ's use of the factors infringed on state autonomy in a manner that raised Tenth Amendment concerns.""DOJ did not exceed its statutory authority in awarding bonus points to applicants that selected the illegal immigration focus area," the judges wrote, arguing that "DOJ's determination that the techniques of community policing may be used to address this public safety issue (illegal immigration) was entirely reasonable."The court's decision comes ahead of Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids scheduled for Sunday in nine major cities, including Los Angeles. City officials have come out against the impending raids — the Los Angeles Police Department said Thursday that it "does not and will not participate in the enforcement of civil administrative law," and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti tweeted suggestions Friday for how to deal with ICE agents. The White House praised the court's decision, saying in a statement Friday that it "reverses a lawless decision that enabled Sanctuary City policies, putting the safety and security of all Americans in harm's way." "The ruling upholds the right of the Department of Justice to ensure discretionary grants under its control are not being used to subsidize these jurisdictions' open assault on law-abiding Americans and their loved ones," the statement added.Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer said the city would look at every option, including an appeal to a larger panel of the 9th Circuit, the Los Angeles Times reported Friday."If this decision were to stand, this or another administration could add other conditions, favoring jurisdictiRead More – Source

[contf] [contfnew]

CNN

[contfnewc] [contfnewc]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here